Camavinga shared happy moments with his family and performed a victory dance with his younger brother
In Tchouaméni’s absence, the Frenchman has assumed the role of pivot in the midfield and has excelled in recent games.
At the root of their midfield, Real Madrid has already learnt to function without Aurélien Tchouaméni. Since sustaining a foot ιnjury during the victory over FC Barcelona, the Frenchman has been replaced by his countryman Eduardo Camavinga and is unlikely to play again until 2024.
Given Eduardo’s relative inexperience and more dynamic profile, Carlo Ancelotti initially had his doubts about the idea, believing the player would feel more at ease in a position higher up the pitch. However, Camavinga has flourished since Ancelotti gave him his role while he was away.
Toni Kroos replaced Tchouaméni in the previous campaign, but Camavinga was kept at left-back, where he excelled while freely acknowledging that he didn’t enjoy the position. Now that he has said it multiple times, the player does not like playing there, but he has also stated that he will easily return to that side of the defensive line at Ancelotti’s request.
Who will take over as the main actor upon Tchouaméni’s return?
He is currently needed as the defensive pivot in the middle of midfield and is excelling in the position. Despite the outcome, he looked fantastic and won the ball back nine times in the La Liga match against Rayo. He had a terrific performance against Braga and raised his game against Valencia, securing seven ball recoveries.
With such impressive performances, a challenging question arises: who will play as the pivot once Tchouaméni returns to full fitness?
As soon as one begins to analyze the problem, it becomes both incredibly challenging and incredibly fascinating since it goes beyond a simple discussion of which player should play the position. Because Tchouaméni and Camavinga are such dissimilar players, it raises the question of how to interpret that deep-lying position in the system in a fundamentally different way.
When it comes to causing havoc and neat ball play, Tchouaméni may play a more positional, composed, and metronomic style of play, whereas Camavinga is more daring, taking more chances but winning when it comes to upsetting the
The comparison of Tchouaméni with Camavinga’s statistics
It’s important to consider each player’s precise pass percentage: Following the ιnjury to his teammate, Camavinga is on 85% while Tchouaméni is at 93%. Perhaps surprisingly, the former Monaco midfielder makes more passes in the opposition’s half (57% vs52%), more passes per game (69 vs53), and more accurate passes (64 vs 45).
Even though he loses the ball far more frequently (14.3 vs. 7.5), the former Rennes midfielder is miles ahead in recoveries (7.1 vs. 4.3 per 90); Eduardo attempts more take-ons per game (3.4 vs. 0.5) and is far more successful (2 vs. 0.3).
Conversely, Ancelotti does not refute the evidence. This year, Camavinga has adjusted to the role far better than the player who arrived in 2021 and was frequently substituted out because of yellow cards and suspension fears. Even though the player occasionally still receives a highly needless yellow card against Valencia, Ancelotti is emphatic in his evaluation, saying, “It’s clear that he is getting to being a pivot.” He has performed admirably at that position in the previous games without Tchouaméni.” There isn’t a debate at the moment, but when Tchouaméni comes back, Carlo Ancelotti can find himself under suspicion.